reacting coolly to word that North Korean leader Kim Jong Un
would be willing to give up his nuclear weapons
if the U. S. commits to a formal end to the Korean War
and a pledge not to attack the North.
Bolton says on CBS'
"Face the Nation" that "We've heard this before."
He says North Korea's propaganda playbook
"is an infinitely rich resource."
John Robert Bolton (1948~)
美 제27대 국가안보보좌관
The Latest: US reacts coolly to North Korea on weapons
By: Site Administrator
Posted at 3:58 PM, Apr 29, 2018
and last updated 6:58 AM, Apr 30, 2018
The Latest on North Korea’s diplomatic overtures (all times local):
1 a.m. Monday
U.S. national security adviser John Bolton is reacting coolly to word that North Korean leader Kim Jong Un would be willing to give up his nuclear weapons if the U.S. commits to a formal end to the Korean War and a pledge not to attack the North.
Bolton says on CBS’ "Face the Nation" that "we’ve heard this before." He says North Korea’s propaganda playbook "is an infinitely rich resource."
The South Korean president’s office is reporting that Kim outlined his position at the two sides’ historic summit on Friday.
The Korean Peninsula technically remains in a state of war because the 1950-53 Korean War was halted with an armistice, not a peace treaty.
7:45 p.m.
Pope Francis is hailing what he called the "courageous commitment" undertaken by the leaders of North and South Korea.
Francis told faithful in St. Peter’s Square on Sunday that he is accompanying "with prayer the positive result" of Friday’s summit and praised the leaders’ aim to "achieve a path of sincere dialogue for a Korean Peninsula free of nuclear arms."
He prayed that hopes for a peaceful future "won’t be disappointed" and that the collaboration can continue for the benefit "of the beloved Korean people and for the entire world."
Earlier on Sunday, South Korea’s presidential office said North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has vowed to shut down the country’s nuclear test site in May. But there has been widespread skepticism about whether the North will fully surrender its nuclear weapons.
___
2:20 p.m.
South Korea says North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is willing to discuss normalizing relations with Japan.
President Moon Jae-in’s office says Moon has briefed Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on Friday’s summit with Kim.
Moon told Abe that he conveyed Japan’s desire to normalize ties with North Korea after resolving issues of "past history." Moon’s office says Kim replied that he’s willing to negotiate with Japan.
The office didn’t provide specific details but Abe reportedly said that Moon addressed the North’s abduction of Japanese citizens during his meeting with Kim.
Japan says North Korea abducted at least 17 Japanese citizens in the 1970s and 1980s to train its agents in Japanese language and culture in order to spy on South Korea. North Korea has acknowledged abducting 13 Japanese in the 1970s. It allowed five of them to visit Japan in 2002 and they stayed. North Korea says eight others have died, but their families say the North’s statement cannot be trusted.
___
11:30 a.m.
Seoul says North Korean leader Kim Jong Un plans to shut down the country’s nuclear test site in May and reveal the process to experts and journalists from the United States and South Korea.
Seoul’s presidential spokesman Yoon Young-chan said Sunday Kim made the comments during his summit with South Korean President Moon Jae-in on Friday.
Yoon says Kim also said President Donald Trump will learn he’s "not a person" to fire missiles toward the United States. The Kim-Trump meeting is anticipated in May or June.
Yoon says North Korea also plans to re-adjust its current time zone to match the South’s. The North in 2015 created its own "Pyongyang Time" by setting the clock 30 minutes behind the South.
좌로부터 Wang Yi(China), Laurent Fabius(France), Frank-Walter Steinmeier(Germany), Federica Mogherini(EU), Mohammad Javad Zarif(Iran), Philip Hammond(UK), John Kerry(USA) 2016. 7. 14
포괄적 공동행동계획 / 이란 핵협정
(包括的 共同行動計劃, 영어 : Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, JCPOA)
2015년 7월 14일 오스트리아 빈에서 체결된 이란의 핵문제에 관한 합의 문서.
이란이 유엔 안보리 상임이사국인 미국, 영국, 프랑스, 중국, 러시아와 독일 등 6개국(P5+1)과 맺은 협정을 말한다.
이란이 핵개발 프로그램을 포기하는 대가로, 미국과 유럽연합(EU)이 이란에 대한 경제제재를 해제한다는 내용이 주요 골자다.
보통 '이란 핵협정'이라고 부른다.
지난 4월 30일 텔아비브에 있는 이스라엘 국방부에서 텔레비전 생중계 기자회견 May 2, 2018 VOA
Benjamin Netanyahu (1949~)
이스라엘의 제13대, 17대 총리
"Iran lied big time
After signing nuclear deal in 2015,
Iran intensified its efforts to hide secret nuclear files.
In 2017, Iran moved its nuclear weapons files
to highly secret location in Teheran."
"이란은 엄청나게 거짓말을 했다.
이란이 2015년 핵 합의에 서명한 뒤
비밀 핵무기 자료를 숨기는 노력을 강화했고,
2017년에는 수도 테헤란에 있는 비밀 저장소에 이 자료들을 축적했다."
네타냐후 총리는 이스라엘 정보기관 모사드 요원들이 올 1월,
비밀 저장소를 습격해 자료를 확보했다며,
5만5천 쪽 분량 문서와, 또 다른 5만5천 개 문서철,
그리고 CD 183장을 가지고 있다고 밝혔습니다.
그리고 관련문서와 사진, 동영상 일부를 회견현장에서 보여줬습니다.
트럼프, "이란 핵 합의 탈퇴" 공식 선언
도널드 트럼프 대통령이 8일 백악관에서 이란 핵 합의 탈퇴를 공식선언 VOA 2018. 5. 9
트럼프, “이란 핵 합의 탈퇴” 공식 선언
도널드 트럼프 대통령이 8일 백악관에서 이란 핵 합의 탈퇴를 공식 선언했다.
도널드 트럼프 대통령은 8일 이란 핵 합의 탈퇴를 공식 선언했습니다.
트럼프 대통령은 이날 백악관에서 기자회견을 열어 “이란 핵 합의는 재앙적이고 끔찍한 협상으로 애초 체결되지 말았어야 했다”면서 “합의에서 탈퇴한다”고 말했습니다.
트럼프 대통령은 또 “이란이 평화적 목적으로 핵 프로그램을 개발했다는 것은 엄청난 거짓말”이라며 “이란의 그런 약속은 거짓말”이라고 주장했습니다.
한편 이란은 트럼프 대통령의 이란 핵 합의 탈퇴 선언에도 불구하고 핵 합의를 유지하겠다는 뜻을 밝혔습니다.
하산 로하니 이란 대통령은 이날 트럼프 대통령의 핵 합의 탈퇴 선언이 나온 직후 이란 TV에서 “이란은 미국 없이 핵 합의에 남을 것”이라고 밝혔다고 로이터통신 등 외신이 보도했습니다.
이란 핵 합의는 오바마 대통령 시절인 2015년 7월 미국, 영국, 프랑스, 독일, 러시아, 중국 등 6개국과 이란 사이에 체결됐습니다. 이 협정은 이란은 핵 개발을 포기하고 6개국은 이란에 대한 경제 제재를 해제하는 내용을 담고 있습니다.
VOA 뉴스
The Iran Regime-Change Crew Is Back
Defense One 2018. 4. 27
Among the most strident critics of the nuclear deal with
Iran are those who believe it furthers the survival of its
leadership. By throwing Iran’s rulers an economic lifeline,
they believe, the deal is an abject failure.
America’s goal, they say, should never have been “denuclearization,”
but regime change.These days, those regime-
change evangelists, having shrugged off the lessons
of the Iraq War, are back at the helm of U.S. foreign
policy. John Bolton, Donald Trump’s new national-security
adviser, has long advocated regime change in Iran, and
more recently has argued that the administration should
openly embrace it as a foreign-policy goal.
The Iran Regime-Change Crew Is Back
That probably spells doom for the nuclear deal.
By Vali Nasr
National Security Adviser John Bolton attends a meeting with President Trump in the White House, in April. (Susan Walsh / AP)
APRIL 25, 2018 SHARE
Among the most strident critics of the nuclear deal with Iran are those who believe it furthers the survival of its leadership. By throwing Iran’s rulers an economic lifeline, they believe, the deal is an abject failure. America’s goal, they say, should never have been “denuclearization,” but regime change.
These days, those regime-change evangelists, having shrugged off the lessons of the Iraq War, are back at the helm of U.S. foreign policy. John Bolton, Donald Trump’s new national-security adviser, has long advocated regime change in Iran, and more recently has argued that the administration should openly embrace it as a foreign-policy goal. At the same time, Bolton and his ilk are pushing for a denuclearization deal with North Korea ahead of Trump’s planned summit with Kim Jong Un, the country’s leader. Preparations for the meeting will likely be in full swing by May 12, the next deadline for extending the Iran deal. The Trump administration, in other words, could find itself in the odd situation of tearing down the nuclear deal with Iran while pursuing a similar deal with North Korea.
With proponents of regime change ascendant, the temptation in the Trump administration to cast the deal aside in an effort to weaken Iran is great. Yet the immediate ripple effects of such a decision will breed dangerous consequences, both in Iran and across the Middle East—ones that the Kim regime will be watching carefully.
Regime-change advocates were emboldened by the anti-government demonstrations that swept across Iran this past winter. For the first time, economic hardship clearly fueled wide-scale unrest, bringing into the streets thousands of urban and rural poor—the very people that the Islamic Republic regards as its base. Iran is already hard-pressed to address domestic economic needs through the nuclear deal. Without the deal, the situation could grow even more dire. That worry has discouraged investment, and last month led to a run on Iran’s currency.
Since the demonstrations, the Trump administration has viewed Iran’s rulers as vulnerable. Additional economic pressure, it believes, could threaten their hold on power. Undoing the nuclear deal would pave the way for a return to punishing international economic sanctions on Tehran—this time, not only for its nuclear program, but for its pursuit of medium- and long-range missiles, and support for the Assad regime in Syria. Such a scenario would restrict trade, discourage foreign investment, and potentially force Iran out of the oil market. This would please Saudi Arabia, whose economy depends on high oil prices. During his visit to Washington, Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman predicted that the price of oil could rise to $80 a barrel—a price he would need in order to realize his ambitious economic agenda and fulfill the kingdom’s military and political aims. Excluding Iran from oil markets would certainly help realize that prediction.
With the Iranian economy on its knees, the Trump administration thinks Tehran would surrender to a better deal—one that the president, eager to flex his deal-making prowess and outshine Obama, would fancy. But this is a risky strategy. Washington led the negotiations for the nuclear deal, and swore off regime change in the process. If Trump scuttled it not only to improve its terms, but also to inch closer to regime change, it will be difficult to persuade other adversaries with dangerous weapons to seriously consider diplomatic engagement. Without credible diplomatic options, war would become the only path available to the United States to address thorny international issues—the very trajectory that the candidate Trump railed against.
Even if Trump gets regime change in Tehran, it may not be the sort he wants. Canceling the nuclear deal and increasing economic pressure on Iran would further marginalize the moderates and pragmatists who favor engagement with the West, while empowering the Revolutionary Guards and their hardline allies. But before that happened (if it happened at all) the instability Washington would hope to sow in Iran could instead surface in countries where it craves stability, most immediately in Iraq. This is because the nuclear deal has provided the United States and Iran with the tacit context to cooperate in Iraq in the fight against the Islamic State. Without the deal, Iraq could once again become a battleground for U.S.- and Iran-backed forces.
Another unwelcome development that would precede a hypothetical regime change: Iran would likely quickly return to enriching uranium, this time at levels higher than the 20 percent that once so worried the international community. Admiral Ali Shamkhani, the secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, has raised the stakes further, threatening that if the United States quits the nuclear deal, Iran could even leave the Non-Proliferation Treaty, which could mean openly pursuing nuclear weapons.
President Trump, in turn, warned on Tuesday that if Iran resumed nuclear activity it “will have bigger problems than [it] ever had before.” That is unlikely to deter Tehran. In fact, the more the United States threatens Iran’s leadership, the more likely it is to seek protection under its own nuclear shield. Washington would then have to switch gears, put regime change on the back burner, and instead woo Iran back to the negotiating table. The United States would have the same economic leverage it had first time around, but Iran’s nuclear program would be more advanced; Iran would have more leverage to get a better deal than the one the Obama administration
American Enterprise Institute(AEI, 미국기업연구소)
Former U. N. Ambassador John Bolton proposed reunification
as the solution to the North Korean nuclear missile crisis
an Friday's Breitbart News Dairy with SiriusXM host Alex Marlow.
Bolton said President Trump has
"made it clear that this is a different president rhan the
one that North Korea and China have faced for the last eight years."
"한반도를 통일시키는 것이 (중국의 협력을 얻어)
북핵 미사일 위기를 해소하는 가장 좋은 방법이다."
- John Bolton
2017. 8. 11
John Bolton (1948~)
'Why don't we negotiate with North Korea?'
like it's some brilliant new idea. It's not.
It's got a 25-year history of failure and
no evidence that in Year 26 it's going to succeed." said Bolton.
'왜북한하고 대화하지 않느냐고?'
마치 끝내주는 새로운 아이디어처럼 말한다. 아니다.
이미 25년 동안 해왔다. 실패의 연속이었다.
26년째에는 성공한 것이라는 아무런 증거가 없다.
2017. 8. 11
"You deny agreements you entered into not an hour ago,
in fact you yourself offered."
- Colonel James C. Murray, USMC, Panmunjom, November 1951
Surrender Is Not an Option (2007) - John Bolton
"중국이 북한의 정권 교체에
동의하지 않는다면
북한에 대한 무력 공격은
불가피하다"
John Bolton (1948~)
2017. 8. 11
John Bolton (1948~)
美 제27대 국가안보보좌관
The White House is looking at Libya as one example of
how it will handle potential negotiations
with North Korea on dismantling its nuclear program,
John Bolton, US President Donald Trump's national security adviser, said Sunday.
Bolton says US considering Libya model for North Korean denuclearization
(CNN)The White House is looking at Libya as one example of how it will handle potential negotiations with North Korea on dismantling its nuclear program, John Bolton, US President Donald Trump's national security adviser, said Sunday.
But experts say the Libya model is a dangerous one to trot out when discussing North Korea.
Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi agreed to abandon his nuclear ambitions in exchange for sanctions relief in the early 2000s. Within years, Gadhafi was overthrown and killed by rebels backed by Washington.
Analysts who study North Korea say Pyongyang often cites Gadhafi's case to show that only nuclear weapons can deter the United States in the long-term to ensure the survival of the Kim Jong Un regime.
Bolton appeared to use the Libya case as an example of how North Korea might develop the trust of international partners, just days after after Kim committed to the "complete denuclearization" of the Korean Peninsula during a historic summit with South Korean President Moon Jae-in.
"One thing that Libya did that led us to overcome our skepticism was that they allowed American and British observers into all their nuclear related sites. So it wasn't a question of relying on international mechanisms. We saw them in ways we had never seen before," Bolton told CBS News.
Summit preparation
Both US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Bolton are preparing for Trump's upcoming summit with Kim, which the US President said could happen in three to four weeks.
Trump shocked the world last month by accepting an invitation to sit down face-to-face with the North Korean leader after a year of saber-rattling from Washington and Pyongyang.
It's unclear where exactly the two will meet, but Trump suggested Friday the shortlist was down to two to three locations.
North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un (left) and South Korean President Moon Jae-in (right) shake hands over the military demarcation line that divides the demilitarized zone upon meeting for the inter-Korean Summit on Friday.
Pompeo and Bolton have made it clear that a major factor in determining the success of a Kim-Trump summit -- which would be the first meeting between a sitting US President and a North Korean leader -- will be whether both sides can develop a modicum of trust between each other.
Trump: Things changed radically with North Korea01:00
The secretary of state became the highest ranking US government official to ever meet Kim over Easter weekend, traveling to Pyongyang where the two discussed the upcoming talks, Pompeo said Sunday.
"We have a long history of negotiating with North Korea. Repeatedly, they have taken actions only to find that those promises proved false or unworthy or they were incapable of keeping them," said Pompeo.
"My goal was to try and identify if there was a real opportunity there. I believe there is."
Friday's inter-Korean summit was a spectacle filled with pageantry and history-making moments, with Kim becoming the first North Korean leader to travel to South Korean soil since 1953.
Now, the young North Korean leader appears to be moving quickly on the diplomatic front.
Kim will welcome Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi for a visit in the coming days, and the South Korean presidential office said Pyongyang planned to shutter the country's nuclear test site and invite foreign journalists and experts to ensure "transparency" around its closure.
"The United States, though inherently hostile to North Korea, will get to know once our talk begins that I am not the kind of person who will use nuclear weapons against the South or the United States across the Pacific," Kim was quoted as saying by Moon's spokesman Yoon Young-chan on Sunday.
But despite the cautious optimism emanating from Pyongyang, Seoul and Washington, experts say the real work is yet to come.
"As we go from really broad details into more and more definitive outcomes, it's going to be tougher and tougher to keep the whole team on board," said Melissa Hanham, a senior research associate at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies.
South Korea on Monday began to dismantle speakers along the highly militarized border with North Korea after the two Koreas agreed to stop broadcasting propaganda across the border in Friday's post-summit declaration.
The speakers had been playing on a regular basis since January 2016, when they were turned back on as a response to North Korea's fourth nuclear test.
They were used to broadcast Korean pop music, news and weather forecasts -- snippets of everyday life in the South that are strictly off limits for North Koreans.
Friday's summit ended with Moon and Kim agreeing to the "complete denuclearization"of the Korean Peninsula and the formal end of the Korean War, a conflict that is still technically ongoing as hostilities ended with a truce rather than a treaty.
Moon and Kim's commitments were made in a three-page joint declaration that analysts say has lofty goals but is scant on details.
If negotiations were to reach a phase where North Korea is required to declare weapons, experts say a deal with Pyongyang might be complicated and would see the United States push for invasive mechanisms -- like the continued presence of international monitors inside North Korea -- that Kim may balk at.
"Not only would we be watching their uranium enrichment facility -- the one we know about -- their plutonium reprocessing facility and their reactors that we know about in Yongbyon, we would have to hope that there were no other facilities that we didn't know about that were enriching uranium," said Hanham, the nonproliferation expert.
Then there's the issue of the warheads they've already made, the nuclear weapons that are meant to be fitted atop missiles.
"They're small and can be moved around the country and they can be hidden," said Hanham. "We would have to worry about whether they did or didn't declare all their warheads to us."
Muammar al-Gaddafi (1942~2011)
前 리비아 국가원수
John Bolton (1948~)
美 제27대 국가안보보좌관
2018. 4. 29 Interview with Chris Wallace of Fox News
FOREIGN POLICY PublishedApril 29, 2018
Bolton seeks vow from North Korea to abandon nuclear program, as prerequisite for summit
John Bolton on push to rid North Korea of nuclear weapons
National security adviser John Bolton details the Trump administration's strategy on 'Fox News Sunday.'
National Security Adviser John Bolton suggested Sunday that President Trump will not meet with Kim Jong Un unless the North Korean leader agrees to give up his country’s entire nuclear weapons program.
Bolton told “Fox News Sunday” that the leaders are still negotiating a time and place for such a meeting, but that finalizing such logistics hinge on Kim abandoning his nuclear program.
“If, in fact, Kim has made a strategic decision to give up his entire nuclear weapons program, then I think deciding on the place should be fairly easy,” Bolton said.
Bolton said world leaders -- including South Korean President Moon Jae-in -- have lauded Trump for bringing Kim to the negotiating table with painful economic sanctions and “political-military” pressure.
A meeting between Trump and Kim would mark the first time that the leaders of the United States and North Korea have met.
"It's taken a long time, many, many decades to get here," Trump said Friday. "Let's see what happens."
Whoops! We couldn't access this Tweet.
Bolton spoke to Fox News just two days after Moon and Kim held a historic summit on the North Korea-South Korea border, where they vowed to remove nuclear weapons from the Korean Peninsula, without identifying specific, new measures to achieve that goal.
The summit was almost inconceivable a few months ago, after a year when the bordering countries seemed on the verge of war.
The Koreas have technically remained at war since the 1950-1953 Korean War, which was only stopped via an armistice. The two countries have agreed to stop all hostile acts over "land, sea and air" that can cause military tensions and clashes.
World leaders hope Trump and Kim can perhaps further solidify or advance the Korean agreement if they indeed meet in May or June, as projected. However, they remain skeptical.
Trump tweeted Saturday that the logistics for his planned meeting with Kim Jong Un are “going very well.”
A meeting between Trump and Kim also seemed impossible until recent weeks, amid North Korea’s recent testing of a nuclear warhead and ballistic missiles that could launch a nuclear weapon. Just four months ago, Kim threatened the U.S. with nuclear weapons.
The tests resulted in the stiff economic sanctions and an alarming exchange of public name-calling between Trump and Kim that sparked fear of war. Trump had called Kim “Little Rocket Man.” And Kim had called Trump a “dotard.”
Bolton acknowledged Sunday that Trump is “eager to (meet) as soon as possible.”
However, he also made clear that nobody in the administration is “starry-eyed” about Kim indeed dismantling his nuclear weapons program and sticking to his promise.
Bolton also suggested that Kim would have to give up his “entire nuclear program” before sanctions are lifted.
Bolton says Kim must give up
nuclear program before any
summit with Trump
Fox News
"김정은은 트럼프를 만나기 전,
핵 푸로그램을 포기해야만 한다."
한반도의 비핵화에 관한 공동선언
(Joint Declaration of the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula)
1991년 12월 31일 채택된 뒤 1992년 2월 19일 <제6차 고위급 회담(평양)>에서 <남북기본합의서>와 함께 발효됐다.
"미국사람들은 북한에 대해
환상에 빠져 있지 않다"
John Bolton (1948~)
美 제27대 국가안보보좌관
"북한은 거짓말하는 나라···
입술을 열 때 그게 다 거짓말이다"
John Bolton (1948~)
美 제27대 국가안보보좌관
"한반도 비핵화
: 그들의 약속, 미국은 해당되지 않는다"
John Bolton (1948~)
美 제27대 국가안보보좌관
Mike Pence (1959~) Donald John Trump (1946~) John Robert Bolton (1948~)
제48대 美 부통령 제45대 美 대통령 제27대 美 국가안보보좌관
John Robert Bolton (1948~)
제27대 美 국가안보보좌관
Screwdriver
"우리가 지금 Screwdriver를 가지고 갈 수 없으니···
북한이 먼저···"
(북한이 먼저 자료를 내 놓으라는 뜻)
John Bolton (1948~)
美 제27대 국가안보보좌관
Mike Pompeo (1963~)
美 제70대 국무장관
Harry Binkley Harris, Jr (1956~)
美 제24대 태평양 사령관 / 24대 주한美대사 내정자
김정은, ‘핵 보유국 선전하라’
내부 보도지침 내려
“김정은 동지 영도로 사회주의 완전 승리” 남북·북미 핵협상 앞두고 내부 결속 다져 문학창작 기관에도 ‘주민 교양’ 촉구하기도
북한은 핵실험과 대륙간탄도미사일(ICBM) 시험발사를 중단하고, 핵실험장을 폐기하겠다는 내용을 결정한 지난 20일 노동당 중앙위원회 전원회의 결정문을 이튿날인 21일 관영 조선중앙통신사를 통해 발표했다.
북한 내부 소식통은 24일 뉴시스에 “북한 당국은 지난 22일 0시를 기점으로 북한의 모든 신문· 방송·출판 부문은 물론, 평양의 조선문학창작사와 각 도의 창작실에 보도 지침을 내려 보냈다”면서 "그 핵심 내용은 지난 5년 간 핵·경제 병진노선을 성과적으로 이끄신 김정은 노동당위원장 동지의 헌신적 노고에 의해 공화국(북한)이 당당한 핵보유국으로 될 수 있었다는 것을 (주민들에게) 교육·교양 하라는 것”이라고 알려 왔다.
2018. 4. 24 NEWSIS
김정은, ‘핵 보유국 선전하라’ 내부 보도지침 내려
등록 2018.04.24 08:44:26
“김정은 동지 영도로 사회주의 완전 승리” 남북·북미 핵협상 앞두고 내부 결속 다져 문학창작 기관에도 ‘주민 교양’ 촉구하기도
【서울=뉴시스】북한 김정은 조선노동당 위원장이 20일 평양에서 열린 당 중앙위원회 제7기 제3차 전원회의를 주재하며, 풍계리 핵실험장을 폐기하고 경제건설에 총력을 집중한다는 새로운 '전략적 노선'을 만장일치로 채택했다. 2018.04.22. (출처=노동신문) photo@newsis.com
【도쿄=뉴시스】 조윤영 특파원 = 김정은 북한 노동당위원장이 핵실험 중단 등을 발표한 뒤 전국의 보도기관과 문학창작기관에 보도지침을 내려 북한이 핵보유국이 됐음을 주민들에게 알리고 그 의미를 교양하라고 지시한 것으로 알려졌다.
북한은 핵실험과 대륙간탄도미사일(ICBM) 시험발사를 중단하고, 핵실험장을 폐기하겠다는 내용을 결정한 지난 20일 노동당 중앙위원회 전원회의 결정문을 이튿날인 21일 관영 조선중앙통신사를 통해 발표했다.
북한 내부 소식통은 24일 뉴시스에 “북한 당국은 지난 22일 0시를 기점으로 북한의 모든 신문· 방송·출판 부문은 물론, 평양의 조선문학창작사와 각 도의 창작실에 보도 지침을 내려 보냈다”면서 "그 핵심 내용은 지난 5년 간 핵·경제 병진노선을 성과적으로 이끄신 김정은 노동당위원장 동지의 헌신적 노고에 의해 공화국(북한)이 당당한 핵보유국으로 될 수 있었다는 것을 (주민들에게) 교육·교양 하라는 것”이라고 알려 왔다.
이 보도 지침은 또 “김정은 동지의 영도에 충실하면 그 어떤 난관도 헤쳐 나갈 수 있으며 사회주의의 완전한 승리를 이룩할 수 있다는 것을 널리 선전할 것”을 강조했다고 소식통은 전했다.
북한 당국이 남북 및 북미 정상회담을 앞두고 주민들에게 ‘핵 보유국 달성’을 선전하고 교육을 강화하는 것은 대외적 핵 협상을 앞두고 내부의 결속을 더욱 다지려는 의도로 보인다. 또 핵무기 완성이 김 위원장의 지도력 덕분이라고 강조함으로써 그의 대내외적 위상을 한층 공고히 하려는 시도로 해석된다. 이 보도지침에는 조선중앙통신 보도와 마찬가지로 북한의 ‘핵 포기’로 읽혀질 만한 문구는 전혀 없다고 소식통은 전했다.
북한의 조선문학창작사는 북한 문인들의 작품 활동을 통제할 뿐 아니라 생활비 지급 등도 맡고 있는 국가기관으로 회원은 1200여 명으로 파악되고 있다. 북한 당국이 보도기관 뿐만 아니라 문인들까지 내세워 ‘핵 보유국 달성’을 선전하는 작품 활동을 하라고 촉구하고 있는 것은 자신들이 주장하는 ‘핵 무기 완성’을 스스로 ‘역사적 사건’으로 인식해 북한의 문학창작 활동에까지 반영하려는 의도인 것으로 여겨진다.
yuncho@newsis.com
北 신문
"美민주주의 허황성 똑바로 보라"
북한 노동당 기관지 노동신문은 29일
"미국식 민주주의의 허황성을 똑바로 보아야 한다"는 제목의 정세론해설에서
"미국식 민주주의는 반인민적 통치체제이며 침략과 간섭의 도구이다"라며 이같이 밝혔다.
신문은 "미국 집권자들이 떠드는 '자유'는
독점 자본가들이 근로인민대중을 마음대로 착취할 수 있는 자유이며,
근로하는 사람들에게 있어서는 생존권과 노동권을 임의의 시각에 빼앗길 수 있는 자유"라며
"미국식 민주주의가 보편화되면 국제사회는 무법천지로 되고 말 것"이라고 깎아내렸다.
신문은 이어 "미국 집권자들이 자유에 대해 열심히 떠들어대는 이유는
미국식 민주주의를 국제사회의 본보기로 광고함으로써 패권야망을 실현해보자는 것"이라며
"미국식 민주주의는 그 어느 나라에도 맞지 않으며 후과만 빚어낸다.
사람들의 자주적 본성에 배치되기 때문이다"라고 선동했다.
2018. 4. 29 '한국언론 뉴스허브' 뉴시스통신사
"핵 동결은 의미가 없습니다.
핵동결이란 것은 사실상
북한의 핵보유를 인정하는 것이고
결국 이로 인해
전세계적인 핵 확산이 유발될 것입니다."
Henry Kissinger (1923~)
제56대 美 국무부장관
남북한의 종전선언 혹은 평화선언 그리고 미군철수
한미상호방위조약 전문
(Mutual Defense Treaty Between the Republic of Korea and the United States of America)
Article III
Each Party recognizes that an armed attack in the Pacific area
on either of the Parties in territories now under their respective administrative control,
or hereafter recognized by one of the Parties as lawfully brought under the administrative control of the other,
would be dangerous to its own peace and safety
and declares that it would act to meet the common danger
in accordance with its constitutional processes.
제3조
각 당사국은 타 당사국의 행정 지배하에 있는 영토와
각 당사국이 타 당사국의 행정 지배하에 합법적으로 들어갔다고 인정하는 금후의 영토에 있어서
타 당사국에 대한 태평양 지역에 있어서의 무력 공격을
자국의 평화와 안전을 위태롭게 하는 것이라 인정하고 공통한 위험에 대처하기 위하여
각자의 헌법상의 수속에 따라 행동할 것을 선언한다.
(당시) 소련의 힘의 확장을 막기 위해
❝
만약 중국의 고도성장이 정지되고,
중국이 아시아를 지배할 가능성이 없게 될 경우,
미국은 아마도
아시아에 주둔하고 있는 미군 대부분을
본국으로 철수시키게 될 것입니다.
❞
John J. Mearsheimer, 이춘근 역 강대국 국제정치의 비극,
(서울 : 나남출판, 2004) 한국어판
'Legalism'
National security strategy of the United States of America (DECEMBER 2017)
「국가안보전략」에서 제시한 국가안보의 4대 기둥 (4 pillars)
첫째, '미국 국민, 미국 영토, 그리고 삶의 방식을 보호함'
(Protect the American People, the Homeland, and the Way of Life)
둘째, '미국의 번영을 촉진함'
(Promote American Prosperity)
셋째, '힘을 통한 평화의 보존'
(Preserve Peace Through Strength)
Crippled America
: How to Make America Great Again (2015.11)
Donald J. Trump
"우리는 너무나 막강하기 때문에 감히 누구도 미국을 건드릴 수 없는
그래서 사용할 필요가 없을 군사력을 건설해야 한다"
넷째, '미국의 영향력을 확대할 것임'
(Advance American Influence)
PROMOTE A FREE AND OPEN
INDO一PACIFIC REGION : 인도一태평양 전략
PROMOTE A FREE AND OPEN INDO一PACIFIC REGION : President Trump
strenghened the United States-Republic of Korea alliance, which
contributes to a free and open Indo一Pacific.
통합전투사령부 (Unified Combatant Command, UCC)
미군이 2개 이상의 군으로 구성되어 있고, 지속적이고 넓은 범위의 임무를
담당하는 미국 국방부 산하 사령부이다.
USNORTHCOM(United States Northern Command)
미국 북부 사령부
2002년 10월 1일 창설
USSOUTHCOM(United States Southern Command)
미국 남부 사령부
1963년 6월 6일 창설
USAFRICOM(United States Africa Command)
미국 아프리카 사령부
2007년 10월 1일 창설
USCENTCOM(United States Central Command)
미국 중부 사령부
1983년 1월 1일 창설
USEUCOM(United States European Command)
미국 유럽 사령부
1947년 3월 15일 창설
USPACOM(United States Pacific Command)
미국 태평양 사령부
1947년 1월 1일 창설
Fleet locations
Navy to re-establish 2nd Fleet as Russia increases activity in the Atlantic
Chief of Naval Operations(CNO) Adm. John Richardson speaks during the U.S. Fleet Forces (USFF) change of command ceremony aboard the aircraft carrier USS George H. W. Bush(CVN 77). He also announced the Navy will re-establish its 2nd Fleet to oversee assets and operations along the nation's East Coast and in the nothern Atlantic Ocean, as it seeks to counter increased Russian naval activity in the region.
MICHAEL FIORILLO / U. S. NAVY
By COREY DICKSTEIN | STARS AND STRIPES
Published May 4, 2018.
Suprepower : Three Choices for America's Role in the World
一 Ian Bremmer
May 19, 2015 New York : Portfolio / TIME, 2015. 6. 1 여론조사
